Yes, I want to say that. Journalists incoherently present events – they just want to create hype and confuse everyone, so that peoples their media continue to read and listen, endlessly.
The President of Ukraine dismissed the Minister
of Defense and appointed a new one. The reason is needed to understand. No one
will ever show the documents to the public. There is a war going on, the
Minister of Defense is being removed – to weaken the army? They say:
corruption. It is journalists who spread gossip and prove their incompetence
and lack of professionalism.
Is it possible for an ordinary person to
establish the reason? Yes (unless he's on an expedition to the Moon).
I look at the reports in the Russian media: the
new minister is a Tatar, from the Crimea, they brought him there as a child
from Uzbekistan. He lived in a small district town of Alushta. It is very
surprising that such a career. I live in this city, and I have never heard of
such a person. None of the residents heard.
My explanation. In 1991 there was a boom:
Tatars were resettled in the Crimea from Uzbekistan "to their historical
homeland." It was under Gorbachev, they said that in such treaties between
countries, Gorbachev received a certain amount of money for each person, as a
result, he was greatly enriched. Is it only on this? – On everything they
enrich themselves, what they touch, using power. By the way, his wife was
Uzbek. Since there is no communication with commoners in the highest circles,
Gorbachev's wife was from the government clan of Uzbekistan. This is how they
solve things, as they have done since ancient times.
The Tatars moved to the Crimea, initially
behaved very modestly, but quickly got used to it. For several decades, they
penetrated absolutely all positions in the state, even nondescript and
insignificant, but as a result they found themselves in the majority among
officials.
After 1991, the governments of Ukraine and
Crimea turned out to be criminal – they mercilessly plundered Ukraine and
Crimea, and the population. Banditry began. I know this well, because I am
connected with these issues and am engaged in the fight against banditry in the
state.
The Tatars were a new phenomenon for me, I
began to be interested in them.
The vast majority of them are illiterate,
despite the fact that some have Soviet-style diplomas of education. And modern
diplomas – in Ukraine and in Russia they are simply sold as a commodity, and
you don't even have to attend classes.
Tatars do not like to work and do not work –
this is the mentality.
I'll make a reservation right away: I have no
enmity towards any peoples, I just collect information and state the facts in
order to draw the right conclusions for myself.
The Tatars immediately took a criminal stance
towards the population, supporting the criminal government. They do not
recognize laws or morality. So it was in Ukraine, now the same Tatars are also
criminally working for the criminal Russia – against the people.
Living in the Crimea, over time I learned that
the Tatars have a clan system, they are not free in any way and do not
understand the right, freedom.
When the Kremlin seized Crimea in 2014, it
turned out that Tatar clans had shared spheres of influence in Crimea with the
Ukrainian government. They owned private transportation, half of the tourism
industry, the other – I don't remember now. All services with their
participation were organized primitively and illegally – as they know how and
as they are used to in Uzbekistan. The government did not control them in this –
on the contrary, everyone was in a hurry to rob the state and cash in. There
was no law, there was no civilization here, I repeat.
Therefore, I understand why the government of
Ukraine constantly advertised the Tatars and even, through the UN, the
Ukrainian authorities found convenient performers for themselves, through which
they could plunder the Crimea and the population. The Tatars are generally
arrogant without limit, sensing such support.
From history I learn that Uzbekiston was formed
during the collapse of the Golden Horde during the Tatar-Mongol invasion
launched by Genghis Khan. And Uzbek was the leader, the khan who founded this
state. Here, he was named after him – Uzbekiston.
For a long time, I could not find exactly who
the Tatars were, where is their homeland? But I'm very persistent. True, I
spent a lot of time – decades. The homeland of the Tatars is area near the Aral
Sea in Central Asia, between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. My conclusion: when the
sea began to dry up, they migrated with conquests, as is usually the case.
I also learned from history that water used to
take up more space, from the Caspian Sea to the Atlantic Ocean: The
Mediterranean Sea was large, and many modern countries or their coasts were
under water. I don't remember for the Crimea: if a very, very long time ago,
then only the peaks of the highest mountains of the Crimea were visible above
the surface, but this was in the Upper Cretaceous period by geological
definition – 100-66 million years ago.
As for the so-called Tatar-Mongol invasion, it
began in Mongolia, more precisely, many centuries earlier – at the beginning of
our era, and when moving forward, the Mongol tribes began to degenerate, they
were joined by Tatar tribes, which then prevailed, although the Mongols and
Tatars acted with varying success. They began to explore Central Asia and the
Middle East, and Russia was of little interest to anyone – there was a very
small population – a few million, then the Tatars moved to Europe. On the
border with Europe, they were stopped and on the remnants of the collapsed
Roman Empire, they were allowed to create their own state, now it is Turkey.
P.S. Where did I get the knowledge from? I used
the works of the best historians and scientists of the United States and Great
Britain, as well as the most famous Russian historians. At the same time, I
mastered history and much more – in the part that interests me. But this is
such a multifaceted topic that it affects archaeology, medicine, microbiology,
and geology – a lot, therefore, takes a lot of time.
In the Journal of the Ministry of Education
(until 1917, published under the Romanovs), I don't remember exactly, I ditched
two hours searching, I think it's called the "Plan for the Conquest of the
Crimea", 1891, later I will clarify, it is said that the Khan of the
Crimea and the Khan of the Kazan Khanate were brothers, and the Kazan Khan
helped the Crimean. It also says that the Tatars did not work, but lived by
robbery – raids on the Poles, Ukrainians and Russians. Russia endured all this
in order to maintain access to the Black Sea and further to the Mediterranean.
Russia sent 30,000 of its workers to the Tatars – they took care of the
gardens, etc. Russia also paid tribute to the Tatars, often triple, in order to
maintain loyalty. Russia at that time was busy with wars in Europe - with
Sweden and Poland, so Russia did not have enough troops to occupy the Crimea.
At the end of the wars in Europe, Russia occupied the Crimea, and all the
Tatars were evicted. Where to? It is not said – in an unknown direction. This was all
during the reign of Catherine II.
But I digress, although the story is very
interesting. Now the change of the Minister of Defense, this is a trick of
Ukraine – to force the Tatar clans to incur costs and take part in the
liberation of Crimea. That's fair. At the same time, it will turn out how much
they need Crimea: the Tatars are greedy and dishonest, they serve anyone only
for money, and they are not interested in Crimea itself in any way. Moreover,
they have a mentality from Uzbekistan.
There was propaganda in Crimea that they were
very much oppressed in Uzbekistan, so they were forced to leave. At about the
same time that the resettlement to the Crimea began, only ten years later, I
was in the Middle East and talked with exactly the same Tatars: some go to the
Crimea, others to the United States, through transshipment bases. They told me
that no one in Uzbekistan has ever oppressed them, they are just looking for
benefits, namely, the clans that organize everything. There's a whole mafia out
there, but that's another story.
I think I have determined the reason exactly:
to attract the Tatars and their capital to the liberation of the Crimea. I
think there will be liberation soon.
From biographical data in the Russian media
about the new Minister of Defense of Ukraine. The information is contradictory,
perhaps not accurate, but there are no other yet. To be honest, that's enough
for me:
Name: Umerov Rustem Enverovich.
He was born on 19.04.1982 (age 41) in the city
of Bulungur, Samarkand region (Uzbekistan) in a family of immigrants from
Alushta. Others write differently: some time after his birth, the family moved
to the Crimean city of Alushta.
Ethnic Crimean Tatar.
He graduated from the Crimean boarding school
for gifted children. There he won a scholarship from the State Department's
Future Leaders Exchange Program (FLEX) and went to study in the United States.
He returned to Ukraine in 1998 with a bachelor's degree in economics and a
master's degree in finance from the National Academy of Management (Kyiv) with
a degree in finance and credit.
He began his career as a top manager in the
company of the Ukrainian operator lifecell (mobile operator in Ukraine), which
is owned by the Turkish Turkcell, close to the Erdogan family.
He worked in the GSM / TDMA network development
department as the head of the site management and legal support department.
He was the head of the procurement, logistics,
and contract management departments.
He was responsible for sales at Lifecell and
customer relations. He moved to ICG Investments, where he worked as Managing
Director. He moved to the same position at iCapital.
Co-founder of the investment company ASTEM and
its ASTEM Foundation. The Foundation funded Stanford University's New Leaders
Ukrainian program. ASTEM manages investments in communications, information
technology, and infrastructure.
Adviser to the leader of some Crimean Tatar
structures, Mustafa Dzhemilev, from whom he received active assistance.
Together with Dzhemilev, he was one of the initiators of the construction, with
the support of Turkey, of 1000 apartments for internally displaced Crimean
Tatars and privileged categories of Ukrainian citizens. An active figure in the
Crimean Tatar movement, a member of the Kurultai, his brother Ruslan is one of
the sponsors of the Mejlis, became a co-founder of the youth organization of the
Mejlis "Bizim Kyrim" (Our Crimea).
People's Deputy of Ukraine.
He was appointed secretary of the Committee on
Human Rights, De-occupation and Reintegration of the Temporarily Occupied
Territories.
Chairman of the Temporary Special Commission of
the Verkhovna Rada on Monitoring the Receipt and Use of International Material
and Technical Assistance during Martial Law.
Deputy Head of the Permanent Delegation of the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. He joined the group for the
development of the "state strategy for the de-occupation of Crimea and
Sevastopol" under the National Security and Defense Council.
He was a co-chairman of the Crimean Platform
deputy association, and was a member of the Ukrainian delegation at the talks
with Russia in the spring of 2022.
He became a member of the delegation of Ukraine
to participate in negotiations with the Russian Federation on the preparation
and approval of a draft treaty on security guarantees for Ukraine.
Chairman of the State Property Fund of Ukraine.
He has never served in the army; he has no
military education. In Russia, it is similar: Shoigu never served in the army,
he did not study military science anywhere.
One of the shareholders of the Turkish company
Turkcell. Also, the shareholder of the company is Oleksandr Mamut, a friend and
partner of Roman Abramovich, who was an intermediary in organizing the
Russian-Ukrainian negotiations in 2022. "The Turks are attached to the
control panel of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. Ukraine's new defense
minister will lobby for Bayraktar, or is this the contour of a new big deal in
which Istanbul is a key player?" the Russians ask.
Umerov participated in the organization of a
large-scale exchange of prisoners, including the commanders of the Ukrainian
nationalist battalion "Azov". Ukrainian media claim that he managed
to involve Turkey and Saudi Arabia in this process.
In other words, there is a lot of bargaining
between countries, between clans, how they will divide the income from the
ownership of Crimea among themselves. They have not yet begun to liberate
Crimea, but have already divided it into spheres of influence, as before, which
is disgusting. Of course, this Umerov is the son of the head of some clan, who
is put forward to command immediately after school, who is unable to work
independently, to be responsible for his actions, to bear risks, and to whom
the mafia draws up all its transactions. He is a fictitious person. And you
say: abilities ..., democracy ..., obey your mother ... They needed access to
the Black Sea, so the Tatar from the thieves' department of state property
turned out to be the Minister of Defense, having neither education nor a
concept of war.
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий