Food. Nutrition. Health. Future

Since ancient times, man has eaten meat (mammoths, insects, etc., what can be obtained). Then there were nomads (, cattle breeders, fishermen, beekeepers) and farmers, if you don’t look at everything in detail. Today, those who, from childhood, consume a lot of meat and fatty dairy products (milk, sour cream in large quantities), grow larger compared to ordinary peers – a little taller, broad bones and shoulders, and a lot of weight. However, the stool of those who eat a lot of meat is smelly compared to those who eat plant foods. Obviously, the load on the stomach in such cases is greater and the effect is more harmful. I don’t know medicine – there are so many reasons for a person to be unhealthy now, but eating meat on the body has not been studied and can cause a number of diseases or preconditions for them. No, I am not advocating for those who completely give up meat: the need for eating meat for the body is determined by its structure, which has developed over millions of years of development of the organism from which man later descended. There are no substitutes for meat, and even cottage cheese, which is similar in properties. I noticed to the UN calls on this matter. Obviously, the United States is promoting its ideas through them (as well as the incomprehensible coronavirus vaccine – business). The conditions of human existence are changing, and so is nutrition. But the structure of the body is laid down in the genes and the body reacts to all changes. Has all this been researched? Have the consequences been calculated? I have never seen this anywhere or from anyone. Are people really not taken into account and constant experiments are carried out on them? Obviously, I will contact the UN and the State Administration of the US President and raise this issue. The benefit of plant food is undeniable, but there is not enough land to grow it, and not for a long time. How are all these issues resolved? At the level of appeals, agitation and arrogant, irresponsible experiments – everything that I have encountered so far. Nobody is interested in developing the harmony of nutrition and development. Due to the large population, obviously. What about the consequences of any decision? – are not calculated in order to avoid liability and not incur costs. But the population is not involved in all these issues – the ruling classes are not interested in the opinion of the people, the unity of power and the population – we are talking about democracy as euphoria.

Google AI:

Food. Nutrition. Health. Future

Your writing raises important questions about the impact of food on human health, as well as the future of human nutrition.

The effect of meat on health

You note that people who eat a lot of meat and fatty dairy products from childhood grow up larger than their average peers. This is due to the fact that meat is a rich source of protein, which is necessary for the growth and development of the body. However, as you also point out, people who eat a lot of meat tend to have smellier stools. This is due to the fact that meat is more difficult to digest in the body than plant foods.

When it comes to the health effects of meat, there are studies that link eating red meat to an increased risk of developing certain diseases, such as bowel cancer, cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. However, it is important to note that these studies do not prove that meat is a direct cause of these diseases. It's possible that people who eat a lot of meat also lead unhealthy lifestyles, which is what leads to the development of diseases.

In general, it can be said that eating meat in moderation does not have a negative impact on health. However, people who have an increased risk of developing certain diseases should limit their consumption of red meat.

The future of human nutrition

You also note that the human condition is changing, and nutrition must also change. You pay attention to the UN calls to reduce meat consumption.

The UN believes that reducing meat consumption is necessary to tackle a number of problems such as climate change, natural resource depletion and health problems. Meat production is a major source of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change. In addition, meat production requires large amounts of water and land. Finally, eating meat is associated with an increased risk of developing certain diseases.

There are a number of alternative protein sources, such as plant proteins, that can help reduce your meat intake. Plant proteins are found in foods such as legumes, nuts, seeds and whole grains.

However, as you point out, growing plant food also requires resources. In addition, not all people agree that it is necessary to reduce their meat consumption. Many people believe that meat is an important source of protein and other nutrients.

The future is likely to see an increase in the consumption of plant-based foods. However, it is unlikely that will be able to completely give up meat.

Me: Not enough. Is constant research and monitoring needed? Monitoring is not about that all over the world. If you set the goal to create conditions and raise healthy peoples, the benefits from them will be many times greater, and medical costs will be reduced tens of thousands of times. But medicine, like oil refineries or gas producing plants, is a business. And if they are “fighting” the second, then the main question has not been raised: it is possible to preserve a clean planet and have less impact on the subsoil, but the population will die out, judging by the progress of the rapid destruction of the autonomic nervous system. The planet will survive without humanity. Then, why all this fuss, disturbing people and countries – aggressive business? Shortsighted. Although, I don’t know much about such plans and would never guess in advance.

Google AI:

I agree with you that ongoing research and monitoring in nutrition and health is needed. This is the only way we can understand how dietary changes affect human health and what the long-term consequences of these changes are.

I also agree that if the goal was to create healthy nations, it would do more good than just reducing meat consumption. Healthy people get sick less often, live longer and are more productive. This would lead to lower health care costs and increased labor productivity.

However, as you point out, medicine and other health-related industries are businesses. And business, as a rule, is interested in maintaining the status quo. If people are healthy, they won't need as much medical care. This could lead to lower profits for medical institutions and pharmaceutical companies.

Regarding the question of why some countries are calling for a reduction in meat consumption, there may be different motives. Some countries truly care about the health of their citizens and the future of the planet. Other countries may simply be trying to promote their own interests, such as producing plant-based protein or reducing dependence on imported meat.

Regardless, I believe it is important to continue research and discussion about the effects of nutrition on health. This is the only way we can make informed decisions about the future of our nutrition and health.

Here are some specific suggestions that may help improve the situation:

• Increase funding for nutrition and health research.

• Create independent bodies that will monitor the impact of nutrition on health.

• Conduct independent educational campaigns who will monitor the impact of nutrition on health.

These measures will help us better understand how dietary changes affect human health and take action to improve public health.